Upload speeds (averaged out of 3 tests per region using 30GB vbk and large block):īackblaze (USA - West): 60 MB/s * could be Sacramento or Phoenix 21 MB/s latest Maybe I need to set compliance in their UI to match Veeam immutability settings but seems cumbersome.

Wasabi: Compatible but objects could be deleted on their website. IDrive and Wasabi: Compatible and objects cannot be deleted on their website. Wasabi: Minimum 30 days for Veeam customers plan (90 days for regular customers) Wasabi: Free up to 1X the total storage in a monthīackblaze: $0.004 to $0.040 per 10,000 with 2,500 free per day IDrive: Free up to 3X the total storage in a month Wasabi: $5.99/TB/month (Discounts over 50TB on 1, 3 or 5 years upfront) IDrive: $4.09/TB/month ($40/TB/year $4/TB/year for first year Promo) I started using and testing 3 object storage providers in the past month: Wasabi, Backblaze B2 and iDrive E2 and here are my findings. So I decided to write this post for other Veeam customers out there doing the same research, and hopefully it helps them in their decision. There are many object storage providers out there but I could not find any comparisons on these forums. This prompted me into looking at other object storage providers that offered cheaper storage and no API (PUT) transaction costs. First, I tried changing all our backup jobs to use Large Blocks (4MB) to reduce the API calls (which were very high using the default block size of 1MB) which helped reducing our costs by 25%, but increased the incrementals size considerably (using more precious space of our Performance Tier storage). I have been using Azure cool storage as our Capacity Tier for several months, however I wanted to reduce costs since our data keeps growing and API transaction costs represented almost 50% of our bill.

Idrive cost after first year